24th March 2008
Located in a peaceful valley on the banks of the river Esk in Scotland, 15 miles from our new home in Lockerbie, Kagyu Samye Ling was the first Tibetan Buddhist Centre to have been established in the West. It is a centre for wisdom and learning within the Karma Kagyu tradition of Tibetan Buddhism. Samye Ling is a monastery and international centre of Buddhist training, known for the authenticity of its teachings and tradition. It offers instruction in Buddhist philosophy and meditation within the Karma Kagyu lineage of Tibetan Buddhism. It is also a centre for the preservation of Tibetan religion, culture, medicine, art, architecture and handicrafts. The Easter weekend break gave Kate and I an ideal opportunity to introduce our two best friends from Bristol to Samye Ling, and their first experience into Buddhist tradition.

Buddhism has fascinated me for many years. The practice of Buddhism sits nicely with my values and beliefs - The practice of doing no harm, performing wholesome actions and training our mind through meditation. There seems to me to be many similarities between Buddhism, Quantum Theory and NLP, although I am keen to point out that all three are not religious followings or indeed are not the same thing.
I point this out because I got a fright a few months ago when at the end of a NLP Foundation weekend training, a student asked me whether I thought it would be best for him to take our NLP course, or join a Scientology group. I almost collapsed… With the greatest respect to Scientology - of which I know very little about - the two are VERY different. It was like asking me whether I liked to eat oranges or Liver - both are very different to me. What interested me though was his perception of the two and the way he connected them together. It turned out that he had already read a lot about Scientology and was wanting to “match up” ‘NLP’ with his new found ‘religion’. With strong filters in place, it was difficult for him to see the two as two separate subjects.
I have been nagging Kate for some months now to get a dog. I love dogs and particularly want a Golden retriever. Every time I see one I like to point it out to Kate to spark off a conversation where I can influence Kate on how nice having a dog would be. Kate, the astute one in our marriage, is a little more dubious about having a dog as a pet, and thinks more about the restriction this might put on us… My filters on having the dog are so strong that I struggle to see the pit falls - I only see the benefits, whereas on the reverse, Kate struggles to find the benefits of having a dog and focuses in on the pit falls…
While Hayley and Mike were staying with us over the weekend I decided to book a visit in with a local Golden Retriever breeder - I thought this might be an ideal opportunity for Kate to be influenced in my direction to get a dog. If I could change her filters by making the benefits clearer than the pit falls then I was in with a chance of walking away with a puppy… I know that Hayley and Mike are both dog lovers too and would be all cute about the dogs, so the odds were in my favour. The visit went well and the dogs were beautiful. When we talked through having a dog again last night Kate seems to now be swayed towards having a dog. It seems her ‘dog’ filters have changed and are now in place to seek out the benefits, and negate the problems. There’s still work to do and I will keep you up to date on progress…
I’m curious to explore the differences between the ease of changing a personal filter, belief or value about getting a dog for example, over changing a filter on religion or strong, lasting belief. Is it just a simple case of stacking benefits onto one religion or belief over another to influence people in a certain direction, or is there more too it?
Toby x
